Mahna MahnaRandom Ping-o-RamaOne Year Ago Tomorrow...Paul: Only Cooked, Not Cold
Search Me!Last 5 PingsGoogle Appreciation Week
Monday, January 5 2009 Cable Not Included Sunday, January 4 2009 Best Buy: Some Things Never Change Saturday, January 3 2009 Working Post-Holiday Friday, January 2 2009 Happy 2009! Thursday, January 1 2009 Pingegories |
Home | Monthly Archives | About | Contact Monday, February 5, 2001
XFL My approach to the XFL was "curious but skeptical." Would this WWF "extreme" football turn out to be like the USFL or the World League, or would it actually be a worthwhile contender to the NFL? I checked out the first two televised league games on Saturday evening, and they weren't half bad.
The rule changes were mildly interesting. Among the more notable: instead of a coin toss, there is a two-man race-and-scramble for a football to gain initial possession. It also seems like kneeling the ball at the end of a half isn't an option, forcing players to actually play. What I like most is the idea that the players have a small base salary and then are paid more to actually win each game. The XFL also experiemented heavily with a new announce style and drastically different camera angles. The new camera angles, in general, were pretty effective as long as they weren't overdone (I found myself getting dizzy on occasion). In fact, I liked the above-and-behind shot of the players on running plays. As far as announcers, Jesse Ventura and Matt Whateverhisnameis hardly said anything during the one game; Jim Ross and Jerry Lawler (who host WWF RAW on Mondays) did a pretty decent job with their game, aside from Ross' tendency to market the product whose audience was already watching. The caliber of the games was certainly better than the USFL and approaching that of second-string NFL. What I think I liked most about the games (cheerleaders? um...) was the quick pace at which they moved. There wasn't much downtime during actual gameplay. I think XFL has a shot. If they chill out with trying to be so "extreme" and focus in on a number of "innovations" that separate them from the NFL, I think there's a chance the XFL might be around for a minute. I guess what it will all come down to, though, is crowd interest: will America want more football after the Super Bowl? Vince McMahon and crew are betting on it. -ram Comments
FROM: Robert
DATE: Monday February 5, 2001 -- 12:23:11PM I thought it was OK, from what little I saw. However, I have a big problem with JR and the King as announcers. Don't I have to hear those two enough on RAW? FROM: Pat DATE: Monday February 5, 2001 -- 4:07:23PM Ryan, I think you grant the XFL too much. The XFL brand of football is different that that of the NFL (for the most part it seems to be second rate players playing third rate out-of-shape ball because of a shortened mini-camp and lack of talent). Here's what I picked up watching what I was able to stand of the games this weekend: FROM: Robert DATE: Monday February 5, 2001 -- 4:16:17PM Let's not forget that fascinating first-ever in the locker room at halftime sequence, I mean carp - players were just sitting there eating oranges, what the hell is that? FROM: Matt DATE: Monday February 5, 2001 -- 4:51:46PM I caught the second half of the televised games on saturday night. I did really like how in the Orlando game the winning team kept playing until the end of the game. There were a couple of really cool things I saw such as: the quarterback being rushed out of the pocket by three players and still completing a pass cross field to his reciever. That is something I have never seen work in the countless years I have watched football, it does work in the madden video games though. I believe this may be a combination on slow rushers and decent qb. FROM: Ryan DATE: Monday February 5, 2001 -- 6:04:39PM Pat -- Ouch. Guess you didn't like it, huh? :) I'm just being honest -- I went in expecting something really awful, and while a lot of it was weak, I think that with a little time and some more experience, the final product might look a bit more polished. FROM: frank0 DATE: Monday February 5, 2001 -- 8:11:02PM XFL is straight up whack. It looked a lot like the Flag Football league I used to play in - from the bush-league non-stop shit-talking to the nicknames on the jerseys to the dropped TD passes. I didn't see a big diff between it and the NFL, except the NFL features great football players (mostly). I beg to differ about the increased pace observed by Big RM - no way, it seemed like the intro + stupid fumble-drill-as-coin-toss-replacement + extracurriculars made the first 5 minutes of game time go by sloooooow - I believe it took 1/2 hr. FROM: Ryan DATE: Monday February 5, 2001 -- 11:22:53PM Frank -- You don't comment much, but when you do, you make it worth it. :) FROM: Robert DATE: Friday February 9, 2001 -- 12:58:36PM Who's excited for week 2? FROM: Paul DATE: Friday February 9, 2001 -- 1:11:57PM What?! They're doing it two weeks in a row? FROM: Robert DATE: Friday February 9, 2001 -- 4:43:10PM Honestly, I don't even know. I just assumed that they were. They bought all those XFL signs so they might as well do it again. FROM: mike DATE: Thursday August 16, 2001 -- 8:43:09PM better than the usfl?ha-ha!!!,at least the usfl lasted 4 years. FROM: Ryan DATE: Friday August 17, 2001 -- 7:16:55AM The USFL also didn't have the entire media against it when it started. FROM: Patrick DATE: Friday August 17, 2001 -- 7:38:33AM Ryan, FROM: DATE: Saturday January 1, 2005 -- 3:08:20 pm There aren't any comments here yet. This Ping is lonely.
© 2009 The Daily Ping, all rights reserved. We are not responsible for the content of any comments on our site. We are also not responsible, in general, so it's all good. |

Recent Comments
01.05.2009 08:47PM
01.05.2009 05:48PM
01.05.2009 05:40PM
01.05.2009 12:12PM
01.05.2009 10:29AM