Mahna MahnaRandom Ping-o-RamaOne Year Ago Tomorrow...Search Me!Last 5 PingsGoogle Appreciation Week
Monday, January 5 2009 Cable Not Included Sunday, January 4 2009 Best Buy: Some Things Never Change Saturday, January 3 2009 Working Post-Holiday Friday, January 2 2009 Happy 2009! Thursday, January 1 2009 Pingegories |
Home | Monthly Archives | About | Contact Monday, May 28, 2001
Back when Steve Jobs introduced the iMac, people around the world (myself included) were amazed that a floppy drive wasn't included. How in the world could anyone get along without a floppy? I immediately pooh-poohed the iMac and said that the lack of floppy would make people think twice. While floppies weren't available in some other recent Macs, this was the big test: would consumers miss a floppy drive? The answer is proving to be a resounding no. Again, I'm not counting techheads in this one. For Joe Consumer, there's very little reason to get a floppy or even need one. CD-RWs have really become a great option and, although they aren't easily changed once closed, that's why we've got email attachments. With that in mind, I can't help but wonder if the ubiquitous Iomega Zip drive is following the floppy's footsteps. The last time I used a Zip was for print production purposes... but that was many months ago. If I need to transport a file between work and home, I email it to myself. If I need to bring a lot of data over, I burn a CD. Easy. I think Iomega had an inkling of this. 100MB quickly became a relatively small amount of space, given the proliferation of MP3s and movie files. The Zip 250 was introduced to combat that, but let's face it, 250MB is pretty small nowadays. Backups would be mighty difficult... especially when a CD-ROM holds 650MB. (Writeable DVD-ROMs, whenever those get sorted out, will hold multiple GB.) Iomega even went so far as to put the Zip name on its line of CD burners... but I think it was too little too late. So what do you think? There'll always be someone that needs a floppy, somewhere, particularly those not running Windows or OS X. And there'll always be someone who needs a Zip. But for the mainstream user, email and CD-ROMs seem to cover all the bases. Do we miss those Zips? -pm Comments
FROM: Terry M.
DATE: Monday May 28, 2001 -- 10:24:53AM I built myself a new computer on Saturday (1.2 GHz Athlon, Debian Linux), and I didn't even bother putting on a floppy drive, and certainly didn't miss it through the install process, and don't really plan on ever missing it. OTOH, I bought a network card over the weekend where the device driver came on a FLOPPY - the horror! FROM: Paul DATE: Monday May 28, 2001 -- 5:02:01PM Zips seemed to really be a bridge between floppies and rewriteable CDs. I can still recall when WORM drives were well into the thousands of dollars; now they're, what, $60? $70? Amazing. FROM: Brian DATE: Wednesday June 6, 2001 -- 9:46:36PM FROM: Paul DATE: Friday July 20, 2001 -- 10:43:46AM Indeed, Brian, indeed. FROM: Ryan DATE: Friday July 20, 2001 -- 10:59:45AM Does this mean I'm going to have to start hoarding Zip 250s for my digital 8-track recorder? FROM: Paul DATE: Friday July 20, 2001 -- 1:05:50PM I would if I were you. Scope out CostCo or Sam's, man. FROM: Terry M. DATE: Friday July 20, 2001 -- 10:05:35PM I wouldn't horde Zip disks. In a few years those things (and the drives) will be a dime a dozen in thrift stores. I'm kind of surprised that they aren't showing up already. FROM: Paul DATE: Saturday July 21, 2001 -- 1:03:03AM Tape backup units. They were out there, I think, when Colorado was still around... before they were gobbled up by HP. FROM: Marcus DATE: Tuesday July 24, 2001 -- 6:47:36PM Iomega's main problem was never the acceptance of the Zip, it was the reliability of the mechanisms. Paul and I both attended Columbia College Chicago, and the heralded graphic design lab (which spends more on computers sometimes than some graphic production firms) up on the 8th floor went through Iomega Zip drives (internal and external) like candy. The disks were prone to the click of death. There aren't any comments here yet. This Ping is lonely.
© 2009 The Daily Ping, all rights reserved. We are not responsible for the content of any comments on our site. We are also not responsible, in general, so it's all good. |

Recent Comments
01.05.2009 08:47PM
01.05.2009 05:48PM
01.05.2009 05:40PM
01.05.2009 12:12PM
01.05.2009 10:29AM