Dear JohnRandom Ping-o-RamaOne Year Ago Today...Paul: Creamed Corn
Search Me!Last 5 PingsWorking from home
Thursday, May 15 2008 lol Wednesday, May 14 2008 Dear John Tuesday, May 13 2008 Vacations Monday, May 12 2008 Mother's Day Sunday, May 11 2008 Pingegories |
Home | Monthly Archives | About | Contact Monday, November 18, 2002
We have a cordless phone, as many Americans do. It's a VTech, and I purchased it to replace a Sony that had a number of problems. The Sony was giving me grief with its volume: the volume control started to stick and jump, causing the person on the other end to sound both shrill and mousy at the same time. The VTech was a nice solution.
Then, of course, its volume control started going south. On the loudest setting, it's extremely difficult to hear the other person. Imagine whispering during a Stones concert, and then degrading that to phone quality. Ick. So, naturally, we want a new phone. But I have to tell you that this has been worlds harder and more frustrating than I could have ever imagined. The reason, simply put, is that phones today are designed quite poorly. It's as if the phone makers decided to make just slightly larger versions of cell phones for home phones. The biggest gripe I have is that I have yet to find a phone that is comfortable to sandwich between the ear and the shoulder. Long distance is still cheaper on landlines (at least for us), and, heck, long conversations are more common on landlines. Thus, one needs a phone that's good to hold and good to sandwich. Most phones are small, rectangular, and uncomfortable. Oh, don't get me wrong - there are some larger phones out there... but they're either enlarged bricks, or have uncomfortable earpieces. Believe it or not, but this Disney phone is probably one of the best out there: it's curved, not very heavy - but still substantial - and felt good in the hand. Of course, it was lacking the features we needed (Disney-free stuff)... and it's for kids. Above and beyond the comfort thing, phones are starting to shed their super-generic looks for a bit of that mini-stereo system appearance: gaudy, chrome-filled, etc. I'd really like to have a phone that looks good and functions just as well, but that seems nearly impossible. All I want is a comfortable, feature-filled phone that doesn't look silly, has excellent usability, and doesn't cost an arm and a leg. Comments
FROM: Chris [E-Mail]
DATE: Monday November 18, 2002 -- 10:41:41 am We have two Vtech cordless phones. We originally bought one because our daughter recognized the brand and decided that was the phone we should have. (Vtech makes a bunch or really cool electronic educational toys). I was pleasantly surprised by the phone. I've had a very diffucult time getting Sony, GE or any other major phone to last more than a year. Th Vtech phone is 3 or 4 years old and still works great. FROM: Rob [E-Mail] DATE: Monday November 18, 2002 -- 12:50:02 pm We have a Panasonic cordless that we got, I think, 2 years ago. Might've been longer than that now, actually. Anyhow... never had any problems with it at all. FROM: Matt DATE: Monday November 18, 2002 -- 1:26:40 pm The phone I've been using for about 12 years is a GE. One of the really cheap ones, only problem is the cord is all twisted. I would suggest picking up a phone that has one of those shoulder rest pieces. The older phones tend to have better quality, as I have seen people with phones dating back to the 80's still actively using them. FROM: Qwik DATE: Wednesday November 20, 2002 -- 10:25:21 am I also have a VTECH 2.4GH ccordless phone. I bought it at Best Buy and it was like $120 with a base station with speaker phone and an extra charge and handset so you could put one upstairs and one downstairs. it also has a built in speaker phone in each of the hand sets. FROM: Vince DATE: Wednesday November 27, 2002 -- 1:23:15 pm The sandwiching problem is awful. We just bought a new cordless phone, but I couldn't name the brand without looking. I tried to chat with someone using the sandwiching technique, and I just couldn't find a comfy position. FROM: Marcus Mackey DATE: Wednesday November 27, 2002 -- 3:45:24 pm The crux of the problem? The fascination with miniaturization. That's the problem. Everything keeps getting smaller and smaller, to the point where it's bordering on useless at that form factor. I mean, at first miniaturization was cool, it helped improve products, make them lighter, smaller, more comfortable than a bulky, gigantic, colossal brick. Yet, the question any designer needs to ask is "How far is too far?" You can only go so far with the design when it's design and minute size render it in such a way that it's going the wrong way, unusable, unpleast to use, or just outright ridiculous. FROM: Marcus Mackey - fixing a typo... DATE: Wednesday November 27, 2002 -- 3:48:08 pm Quoted from above: FROM: Marcus Mackey - egads... must be a bad day LoL DATE: Wednesday November 27, 2002 -- 3:51:58 pm "...because it has to have phones." FROM: Ergolad DATE: Wednesday April 13, 2005 -- 5:11:13 pm I'll keep this alive. It's 2005 and we are still in the same boat. Stop the insanity. FROM: Joseph DATE: Thursday April 14, 2005 -- 12:42:27 pm We have a Vtech, FROM: Panasonic DATE: Friday April 15, 2005 -- 9:43:37 am We've got one of those base-station concepts by Panasonic (5.8Ghz) and every phone has a built in speaker so I tend to just set the thing down next to me when I talk to people. Seems to work pretty damn well. Batteries die anually, looks like. phone book is non-centralized ... nor is any other information (last calls, missed calls) ... though missed calls USUALLY is consistent across phones since they all "see" it. It varies when one phone is out of batteries for a little while. There aren't any comments here yet. This Ping is lonely.
© 2008 The Daily Ping, all rights reserved. We are not responsible for the content of any comments on our site. We are also not responsible, in general, so it's all good. |

Recent Comments
05.15.2008 11:32PM
05.15.2008 11:29PM
05.15.2008 09:54PM
05.15.2008 06:38PM
05.15.2008 09:27AM