Dear JohnRandom Ping-o-RamaOne Year Ago Today...Ryan: The Angry Nintendo Nerd
Search Me!Last 5 PingsWhat would you do for gasoline?
Monday, July 7 2008 In Defense of Fast Food Apples Sunday, July 6 2008 C.H.O.M.P.S. Saturday, July 5 2008 Stars and Muppets Forever Friday, July 4 2008 Dependence Day Thursday, July 3 2008 Pingegories |
Home | Monthly Archives | About | Contact Wednesday, March 30, 2005
Okay. I'll be the first to admit that a breakfast at Burger King has probably never been a super-duper healthy choice. But with the Enormous Omelet Sandwich I think they're pushing things a bit, don't you? It wouldn't be so bad if the thing wasn't filled with fat and calories. I'm all for having what one's body really wants, and if yours wants this, swell. But man - it's got more fat than a Whopper! It's as if the head honchos at Burger King said, "Let's make something that has no real value but will get us attention from the media and The Daily Ping!" Breakfast is a really tough thing in America, it seems. We either have nothing, something really basic (cereal, bagel, donut) or something wackily filling and processed like fast food. Hm... what about falafel for breakfast? Comments
FROM: Dave Walls [E-Mail]
DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 10:00:07 am I stopped into BK the other day for a salad and Diet Coke (seriously), and saw the picture for that sandwich up in the store. FROM: Joseph DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 10:35:25 am You know, part of the problem is how difficult it is to find a diner or cafe that serves breakfast, much less a decent one. FROM: Joseph DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 1:09:01 pm I looked at the nutrition information, and I'm confused. Their math is all wrong. When I add up the individual calories, I get 720, but they give a total of 730, and the rest of the calculation appear to be off, too. Am I missing something? FROM: Ryan [E-Mail] DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 3:02:00 pm Joseph -- Those "where should you live" quizzes I take always put Northampton in the top 2 or 3. I don't recall if "breakfast" was one of the topics they quizzed on... FROM: Joseph DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 3:57:55 pm I see that Hartford, CT ranked high on Paul's list--along with Chicago. Having had extended visits in Chicago and presently being a resident of the greater Hartford area, comparing the two, I see no resemblance. FROM: DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 7:22:09 pm FROM: Ken DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 7:27:48 pm I say we boycott breakfast. From now on anything that causes problems will be taken away and put into a little box. Well not a box but it will be forgotten. We could just naje some other meal and give it a less sucky name than "breakfast" i mean wtf! FROM: Dave Walls [E-Mail] DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 8:46:27 pm I say we boycott breakfast FROM: jk DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 9:14:22 pm Joseph, I think one gets fat just from holding the sandwich, thus explaining the extra 10 calories. FROM: Monica DATE: Wednesday March 30, 2005 -- 9:44:02 pm no-one eats fruit for breakfast? It's nice to start the day with fiber. ;-) FROM: Dave Walls [E-Mail] DATE: Thursday March 31, 2005 -- 10:14:32 am jk -- FROM: Andy DATE: Friday April 1, 2005 -- 8:23:19 am A number of years ago on a "business" trip to Las Vegas, I joined some co-workers for breakfast at the hotel cafe. One of them had four orders of cinnamon toast and chocolate milk. Just the sight of it was nearly enough to make me ill, although the previous night's activities may have contributed. FROM: Joseph DATE: Friday April 1, 2005 -- 1:19:44 pm Next time I go to the grocery store, I'm definitely buying Golden Grahams. What type of chocolate milk do you prefer, Dave? FROM: Merle [E-Mail] DATE: Friday April 1, 2005 -- 3:35:40 pm That's okay, try Hardee's "Monster Thickburger": http://www.hardees.com/pressroom_details.cfm?id=62 FROM: Ryan [E-Mail] DATE: Friday April 1, 2005 -- 5:14:17 pm Have a Enormous Omelet Sandwich for breakfast, a Monster Thickburger for lunch, and a tiny l'il cheesesteak for dinner. That's good eatin'. FROM: jk DATE: Friday April 1, 2005 -- 9:23:53 pm Joseph, Dave--I am an Ovaltine woman so I too can control the chocolate ratio....would this be tasty? FROM: Dave Walls [E-Mail] DATE: Saturday April 2, 2005 -- 9:10:41 am I find the chocolate milk-Golden Grahams to be extremely tasty. The key is to not get milk that is TOO thick or chocolatey. Ovaltine works well, jk. Personally, Nesquik in the carton. Usually, the store-brand milk seems to be too thick for my liking. FROM: Merle [E-Mail] DATE: Sunday April 3, 2005 -- 2:07:30 pm Ryan: I think if you had an Enormous Omelet Sandwich and a Monster Thickburger in the same week, you would not be worried about supper. FROM: Ryan [E-Mail] DATE: Monday April 4, 2005 -- 9:34:36 am Ryan: I think if you had an Enormous Omelet Sandwich and a Monster Thickburger... FROM: matthew DATE: Tuesday April 5, 2005 -- 9:31:09 am YooHoo is not milk...its chocolate water! I wouldnt advise mixing cereal into it :( There aren't any comments here yet. This Ping is lonely.
© 2008 The Daily Ping, all rights reserved. We are not responsible for the content of any comments on our site. We are also not responsible, in general, so it's all good. |

Recent Comments
07.07.2008 07:48PM
07.07.2008 12:34AM
07.06.2008 10:29PM
07.05.2008 06:04PM
07.05.2008 10:45AM