Mmmm... BrowniesRandom Ping-o-RamaOne Year Ago Today...Search Me!Last 5 PingsCellophane color
Sunday, October 5 2008 Duplicitous Saturday, October 4 2008 Home Shopping Bloopers Friday, October 3 2008 HD Redux Thursday, October 2 2008 Google 2001 Wednesday, October 1 2008 Pingegories |
Home | Monthly Archives | About | Contact Sunday, July 10, 2005
Earlier this week news came out that a guy in Florida was arrested for using another guy's open WiFi network. I'm of the mindset that WiFi is something that should be free and open, but on the other hand, my network doesn't broadcast its name everywhere and is behind a password. I think part of it is simply because there are already five other networks that I can access from our office, including on occasion the one at Caribou Coffee downstairs. But I'm also a little hesitant because, well, what if someone really does download kiddie porn via my open network? Then SBC's coming after me, and that's really not very pleasant. I know that's an extreme conclusion, and it's one that is often used when talking about sharing WiFi. But it still leaves me a little uncomfortable. The worst part about the whole arrest situation is that it could have been solved by the network's owner just locking the thing down. In my opinion, if he didn't know how to do it then he should still be held liable. If he pleads total ignorance, that's one thing. But come on. It's like putting a drinking fountain out in front of your house and then getting angry when people walking by stop to use it. But ultimately, getting arrested for using another WiFi network seems extreme. In the meantime, people are still confusing "loose" for "lose" on the web - and they get off scott-free. Comments
FROM: Joseph
DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 1:38:49 pm I don't know, Paul, while I'm with you on the extreme nature of arresting someone for stealing another's WiFi, it is a sin against the Ninth Commandment, which states "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's WiFi," or something. FROM: dave DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 2:12:03 pm Joseph, if the Commandments were truly enforced, the world would be a very different place. FROM: CrOaKeR DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 2:22:47 pm Its the point that comes up time and time again. The people who make these laws do not understand the technology enough. Its a hard to come up with a solution to the problem, but arresting people is extreme. In some ways its like saying if i can hack in to your computer network, its your fault for being lax on security, but should the hacker take all the blame? Sorry for ranting, its one of those days...... FROM: Merle [E-Mail] DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 2:48:24 pm Ignorance of how to set up your wireless network is a tricky thing. I mean, a company selling routers that come with 400pg manuals you have to read before you can install the thing just aren't going to sell. These are being sold as "plug it in and it magically works". The vendors are pushing technology that is beyond most people's abilities. FROM: Chris [E-Mail] DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 3:52:29 pm The paper actually stated that the guy "hacked" into the network. How exactly do you hack into an open and publicly accessible wifi signal? FROM: Joseph DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 6:11:59 pm The question really is, "what is the proper method of enforcement?" The ten commandments are enforced in all kinds of different ways depending on where you happen to be at the time of breaking one, how you happen to break one, and, of course, who you are when you break one, not to mention what your intention was at the time of breaking one. This is why it's all so complicated. FROM: Joseph DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 6:12:52 pm The question really is, "what is the proper method of enforcement?" The ten commandments are enforced in all kinds of different ways depending on where you happen to be at the time of breaking one, how you happen to break one, and, of course, who you are when you break one, not to mention what your intention was at the time of breaking one. This is why it's all so complicated. FROM: Joseph DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 6:14:30 pm And now I double Pinged! I swear I didn't do that to underscore the point. My computer froze up for a second and gave me an error message that stated that the request to contact www.dailyping.com timed out. So, I sent it again. I could be arrested for this? FROM: Paul DATE: Sunday July 10, 2005 -- 8:24:40 pm Joseph: yes. FROM: Merle [E-Mail] DATE: Wednesday July 13, 2005 -- 3:55:07 pm Chris: well, there's a tiny bit of knowhow in terms of "hacking" into the network itself.. detecting it, getting your antenna pointed the right way, figuring out the correct subnet. But that's not the challenge. The encryption was. FROM: Joseph DATE: Wednesday July 13, 2005 -- 10:29:03 pm Interesting tidbit: if I bring my wireless laptop to an internet cafe to use their network but end up accidentally logging on to another's this could be a problem. FROM: Paul DATE: Thursday July 14, 2005 -- 9:41:00 am How do I know which one is the cafes? There aren't any comments here yet. This Ping is lonely.
© 2008 The Daily Ping, all rights reserved. We are not responsible for the content of any comments on our site. We are also not responsible, in general, so it's all good. |

Recent Comments
10.06.2008 08:54AM
10.05.2008 04:16AM
10.04.2008 11:36PM
10.04.2008 08:10PM
10.04.2008 12:27AM